From The Chronicle of Higher Education
From the issue dated September 15, 2000
HOT TYPE
NYU Press to Publish Book U. of Illinois Press Rejected, on Controversial
Campus Mascot
By JENNIFER K. RUARK
HOME OF THE BRAVE: When Carol Spindel decided to write a book about a
controversy at her university, the university's press seemed the obvious
home for it.
Dancing at Halftime, about the embattled University of Illinois team
mascot, Chief Illiniwek, "was very much a regional book," says the writer,
an adjunct faculty member in the English department at Urbana-Champaign.
Indeed, the University of Illinois Press was initially very interested. Peer
evaluations of the manuscript were positive enough that the press asked
her to revise it, and a local paper covering the Chief controversy
reported that Illinois would publish the book.
But the revised manuscript never went back out to the reviewers. In
April 1998, Ms.Spindel was surprised to receive a rejection letter from
Ann Lowry, the press's assistant director, explaining the decision of the
press's then-director, Richard L.Wentworth: The controversy -- between
those who think the Chief is a racist caricature and those who think he
is an honorable symbol of the region's past -- had grown more, rather
than less, heated since Ms. Spindel had submitted the manuscript. Members
of the university's board, which has long fought efforts to dump the
Chief, had dug in their heels.
"Given that the Press's books are formally copyrighted in the name of
the Board of Trustees, Dick is concerned that our publication of Dancing
at Halftime would
constitute an affront to certain members of that body," wrote Ms. Lowry.
Moreover, Mr. Wentworth was scheduled to retire before the book could be
published and didn't want "his successor to be plunged immediately into a
protracted controversy." The director himself called Ms. Spindel two days
later to apologize.
"They had been so enthusiastic," says Ms. Spindel. "It's not what I thought
university presses did." Other observers on the campus cried "censorship!"
and the rumor circulated that the board had threatened repercussions if
the manuscript were published.
Not at all, replies Mr. Wentworth, who still works at the press part-time.
"We've never consulted with the trustees on anything we've published," he
says. He acknowledges that he was worried about putting his successor in a
pickle, but
emphasizes that the readers' reports on the manuscript were mixed: "There
wasn't a good enough case for us to proceed. I'm sure it's a very
different manuscript at this point."
Ms. Spindel thinks so, as does Eric Zinner, her editor at New York University
Press, who urged her to broaden the book beyond Chief Illiniwek. In October,
N.Y.U. will publish the result, Dancing at Halftime: Sports and the
Controversy
Over American Indian Mascots.
Chief Illiniwek is still Ms. Spindel's central case study. Although she has
campaigned against him, her book is less a polemic than an exploration of
the Chief's meaning for his supporters and detractors alike. Ms. Spindel,
a transplant to Illinois who never expected to make her home there,
initially supported the mascot. "I felt concerned that they were being
criticized for creating a fictional character," she says. "As a writer,
that bothered me."
But she finally decided that even "benign" Indian mascots obscure the
truth of Indian life today. She thinks the tenacity of their fans reveals
something about American life. "People have a real longing for connection
to place. Well, if they think very seriously about how we acquired this
land, they're caught in a tangle of ambivalence. Mythology is the human
solution to that bind. But a myth that justifies the actions of the
non-Indian majority does us real harm. Somehow we have to create a
history that's encompassing and inclusive."